BIP-110:
Protecting Bitcoin's Purpose
Temporarily limit the size of data fields at the consensus level, in order to correct distorted incentives caused by standardizing support for arbitrary data, and to refocus priorities on improving Bitcoin as money.
BIP-110: Also referred to as RDTS (BIP-444)
Key Points
A temporary, focused intervention to protect Bitcoin's core mission
Run BIP-110
Support BIP-110 by running a node that signals for activation
Live BIP-110 signaling
Track current miner support, period progress, and the remaining signals needed for activation.
Protecting Bitcoin's Purpose
Starting with the 'inscription' hack in 2022, a trend emerged around embedding arbitrary data into Bitcoin transactions. This creates unnecessary burdens on node operators and diverts development focus from Bitcoin's fundamental purpose: being sound, permissionless, borderless money.
Data storage competes unfairly with payments, making Bitcoin transactions unnecessarily costly. This encourages reliance on third-party payment processors, making Bitcoin payments easier to censor.
By limiting data storage, this proposal liberates developers from endless scope creep, enabling them to focus on what's really important: Bitcoin's success as money.
Evidence archive
WTF Happened in Feb 2023?Review the blockspace, fee pressure, and node-resource data behind the February 2023 spam wave.
“Bitcoin should do one thing, and do it well.”
How It Works
Simple restrictions that preserve all monetary use cases while limiting data abuse
Inputs spending UTXOs created before activation are permanently exempt from these rules — there is no deadline to move existing funds.
Inspect the implementation
The commented walkthrough ties each rule to the tagged Bitcoin Knots source.
Common Questions
Answers to frequently asked questions about BIP-110
Articles
Start with the background, then continue into the BIP-110 analysis

CAPTURE: The Network
Part one documents the people, institutions, and incentives that hodlonaut argues shaped Bitcoin Core's informal power structure before the OP_RETURN controversy.

CAPTURE: The Lever
Part two examines how funding, review influence, and institutional weight can sideline inconvenient contributors without a formal governance process.

CAPTURE: The Merge
Part three of hodlonaut's CAPTURE series traces how a documentation change, Luke's filter patch, and the OP_RETURN uncap PRs built toward Bitcoin Core's contested 2025 merge.
The OP_RETURN Limit Removal: Gaslighting or Technical Necessity?
Melvin Carvalho's research report weighs the stated technical case for removing Bitcoin's 80-byte OP_RETURN limit against process concerns, conflicts of interest, and BIP-110's response.
Important Considerations
Honest assessment of limitations and risks
Deployment Timeline
Key dates and milestones for BIP-110 activation
Signaling Begins
Miners signal readiness using bit 4. Early lock-in if 55% of blocks signal in a retarget period (1109/2016).
Mandatory Lock-in
If not locked in early, mandatory signaling begins — blocks that don't signal are rejected as invalid, guaranteeing lock-in.
Activation
New consensus rules take effect. Blocks violating these rules are rejected by all enforcing nodes. Pre-existing UTXOs remain permanently exempt.
Expiry
52,416 blocks after activation, all restrictions lift automatically.
Signaling uses bit 4 • 55% threshold for early lock-in • Mandatory signaling guarantees activation